motto lotto
Showing posts with label Epicureanism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Epicureanism. Show all posts

Friday, August 4, 2023

Hobbits are Epicureans

Well not exactly but close enough.

When Tolstoy writes about his aristocratic epicurean friends, a voice in my head responds, “Let’s not disparage the Epicureans, old man.”

Epicureans were into simple pleasures and promoted a simpler life than even the Hobbits. But there are a lot of similarities. They’re both into gardens and love their food and friendships. Neither group was aspiring to power or wealth beyond basic sustenance. Neither was after the hifalutin pursuit of the good and both were into mostly keeping to themselves.

It’s those nasty Stoics like Aragorn and Gandalf that get in the way of their peace and quiet.

In any case there’s some sort of morality trap when you start to over rationalize goodness instead of just trying to provide aponia to yourself and the people around you. Many of our daily choices have global consequences now and you need a super rationality to make sure each act is “good”. But that’s really inhuman, we’re terrible at that. We’re better at treating each other well when we have strong contextual cues, when our needs are met by people who are in close proximity.

The wider world has encroached on the Shire though so what to do?

It’s likely impossible at this point but we should rehumanize, hobbitize, epicurianize.

I mean unless you feel like you’re Gandalf and can go slay the Balrog and all that. By all means, go do it. And if you’re Frodo too, go ahead and heed the calling.

I’ll see if I can keep the Shire going while you’re gone.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Tolstoy's (negative) epicureanism

The second way out is epicureanism. It consists, while knowing the hopelessness of life, in making use meanwhile of the advantages one has, disregarding the dragon and the mice, and licking the honey in the best way, especially if there is much of it within reach… That is the way in which the majority of people of our circle make life possible for themselves. Their circumstances furnish them with more of welfare than of hardship, and their moral dullness makes it possible for them to forget that the advantage of their position is accidental … and that the accident that has today made me a Solomon may tomorrow make me a Solomon’s slave. The dullness of these people’s imagination enables them to forget the things that gave Buddha no peace — the inevitability of sickness, old age, and death, which today or tomorrow will destroy all these pleasures.

Tolstoy
This article describes Tolstoy thinking through his broken question related to the meaninglessness of life. I really like the flow of his thinking and how he works through his question/problem. I don't share his perceptions on where the limits of things are (reason/the infinite) but I like thinking with him. The quote above may as well be speaking about us (Americans).